![]() |
| To prevent any mistakes: Especially the Protestant branch of Western Christian Church got very skilled in 'spiritual' (virtual) juggling with the labels 'good and 'evil',
and heavily encouraged slavetrade. And also delayed 'equality of women'. Because Immanuel Kant was protestant AND defender of abstract thinking.
The most agressive branches were found in German Prussia, Anglican England, Calvinist Holland and especially in Southern USA.
In Europe this variant of Roman Christianity got hidden, but in the shape of 'Apartheid' and more stealthy 'Liberty', Liberal and TRUE/FALSE thinking it flourished. 3 main reasons for denying the essence of modern human slavery are: Patriottism (i.e. US), overvalueing the white race, and a fundamentalist trust in Roman Christianity. Joseph McCabe wrote in The Story Of Religious Controversy chapter 19. how Catholicism was ACTIVELY involved in slavery. He writes: ..."Pope Gregory was the greatest slave-owner in the sixth century. " Father Gregory allowed slave-owners to hand over their property to the Church as stand in for God on earth. The Papacy got IMMENSELY rich that way. Pope Gregory with this slave trade DEFENDED slavery. Pope Nicholas V issued the papal bull Dum Diversas on 18 June, 1452. It authorised Alfonso V of Portugal to reduce any “Saracens (Muslims) and pagans and any other unbelievers” to perpetual slavery. This facilitated the Portuguese slave trade from West Africa. The same pope wrote the bull Romanus Pontifex on January 5, 1455 to the same Alfonso. As a follow-up to the Dum diversas, it extended to the Catholic nations of Europe dominion over discovered lands during the Age of Discovery. Along with sanctifying the seizure of non-Christian lands, it encouraged the enslavement of native, non-Christian peoples in Africa and the New World. In 1493 Alexander VI issued the bull Inter Caetera stating one Christian nation did not have the right to establish dominion over lands previously dominated by another Christian nation, thus establishing the Law of Nations. Together, the Dum Diversas, the Romanus Pontifex and the Inter Caetera became blueprint for the Doctrine of Discovery, the global slave-trade of the 15th and 16th centuries, and the Age of Imperialism. To prevent reading of anti-slavery tracts around 1800 the 'Sacred Congregation of the Index' of the Roman Catholic church placed many on its 'Index of Forbidden Books'. Catholics, slaveholding and slavery in the U.S. |
| Also in Roman times freethinkers realized that slavery ('we VERSUS they' thinking; dualism) hindered being 'human'. In the first century Seneca wrote : When we abolish the slavery of half of humanity, together with the whole system of hypocrisy it implies, then the "division" of humanity will reveal its genuine significance and the human couple will find its true form. |
Anyway, the split between church and politics or mind-body split is a Roman Catholic myth.
And this way of thinking later allowed European powers to export slavery all over the world, under the guidance of the pope. It caused slavery Roman style in the America's, and through the English and Dutch invaders in
South Africa (Apartheid). But in the end the Roman Catholic doctrine (the heavenly brotherhood of men) became clever, and hided slavery by using difficult rational terms.
| Every disciple created his own version of the message of Jesus.
The biggest difference exists between the Latin version of the gospel Paul and that of Mark in West-Africa. Paul got influenced by Greek thoughts ('Christ' is a greek notion) and didn't recognize that the Latin translation of his gospel (written down in Greek by Mark) was corrupted in Rome to a reshaped Roman Christianity and indirect in all of Christian Europe. By the way, both Paul and Peter were killed by the Romans in power. The apostles of Jesus didn't start from scratch, but Egyptian Zoroastrian circles accepted Jesus as a kind of new 'buddha'. The visit of 3 Zoroastrian scientists might not be a myth, but evidence that Jesus was recognized in Zoroastrian circles in Egypt. The Roman Empire considered Zoroastrianism as 'pagan' ('strange' or outlaw), maybe reason of the brutal killing of 2 representatives of Jesus. Only in the Gospel of Mark Jesus often is called Son of Man and 'son of Mary', stressing the fact that he is human. |
| The message of Jesus MUST have been very simple, to survive being spread by others after years of travel |
| In his time without present scientific insights of mutancy in the brain and about the tremendous speed of associative brain processes, Jesus could only explain his explosion of creative thoughts as something like 'holy spirit' or 'God'.
But the God of the Hebrew Bible was a half pagan agressive and jealous ghost. My guess of the message of Jesus: - There is only 1 god (in his view he called his extremely strong intuition "my father") - My father makes me 'see' (Jesus doesn't 'think' and presume 'understanding', but is lead by his intuition) - The common sense message of 'my father': Love thy neigbour as a brother or sister (trust your intuition) In Europe even this simple message got corrupted - There is only 1 god (male) - There are his representatives on earth (divine beings like the pope and by him chosen kings and cardinals) - Divine beings should be worshipped by all humans The message of St Mark in West-Africa was near to original (resulting in Coptic Christianity) - Every person has only 1 god (his/her intuition) - Very rarely a chosen human becomes a seeer (extremely strong intuition is very rare) - All that matters is love and respect The Roman Empire as Catholic Church annihilated 2 other apostolic versions of Christianity. The Romans murdered 2 apostles: Paul and Peter. But they didn't succeed fully in destroying Zoroastrian Christianity. The Catholic Church very easily spoke about other view on life as 'satanic' doctrines. The assistants of 'The Lord' molded the Catholic Church by defending 'The Truth' and wiping away other views. A plausible fantasy (End) In present day science terms
|

I'll use the following thought steps:
- Born as Tafari Makonnen in Ethiopia in 1892. 

| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| . |
| On internet I found following text under Wikepedia: "Under Haile Selassie, corruption was rife and poverty rampant. However, after his overthrow, corruption was lessened". Clearly a mistake, based on paper research. Selassie was deposed in 1974 in a marxist military coup under rebel leader General Teferi Benti (who killed the first leader general Aman Andom). Benti probably was well meaning, but should have fought bureaucracy. Because Haile Selassie in the last say 20 years of his reign was a respected ruler, hindered by law and 'mountains' of bureaucratic prescriptions. Of course there had been poverty and corruption, but not because of Selassie being leader. Without any doubt people respected Haile Selassie. Both Selassie and Benti were liquidated by Mengistu. |

Identity: The Amhara claim close ties with the Jews, having adopted many cultural values and religious beliefs from them.
(The One: in my opinion that indeed is with the Judah Jews of King Solomon,
NOT with the later Hellenistic/Romanized Israel Jews.
Because for 70 years Persia deported the Judah Jews 500 km away to Persia (Babylon).
My calculated guess is that the Amharans MAINLY decend from Persian Judah Jews who left Babylon.
That still would nicely explain
that the language of the Amhara is Semitic. And that myths say that the Empire of Aksum was founded by semitic people coming from the Arabian peninsula. The Amhara features are similar to the southern Arabs, olive to brown skin, with Caucasian features and dark circles around the eyes.
The Judah Jews were later practically annihilated by the Hebrews of the Kingdom of Israel.
Political Situation: The monarchy of Haile Selassie was slowly bringing change when it was overthrown by the radical and criminal Communist dictatorship of Mengistu Haile Mariam in 1974.
Customs: Life in the Amhara farming society is hard. Most marriages are negotiated by the two families, with a civil ceremony sealing the contract. Divorce is allowed and must also be negotiated. There is also a "temporary marriage," by oral contract before witnesses.

Leap away from the 'Western World' |