The myth is that behaviour that SUGGESTS being able to distinguish between self and others points at 'consciousness'.
Well apes that ate themselves didn't survive in evolution.
And children of their own milk drinking ape-mothers didn't either, or ape-'leaders' who without emotion harshley suppressed common sense apes.
And poor apes in a nightmare created by a dreamer (like in Zimbabwe) don't survive.
Mammals became experts in 'communication' by COOPERATION during freedom fights, because mammals (however strong and dominant) behaving like obedient zombies always died.| During the dirty Vietnam War 'rational behavior' was introduced by CIA in armytop in buddhist Miyanmar. Now army generals kill buddhist priests. Not because such priests are dangerous, but because they made the generals 'angry. Still no country reacted |
'Rational' philosophers believe in an inner or 'mental process' of 'pure thinking' (mind)
that 'creates' the world (the mind-body problem).John Locke: I may be held morally responsible only for the act of which I am conscious of having achieved; and my personal identity (my self)goes as far as my consciousness extends itself). Translation: My pure reason creates my personal reality and that is my view on the world. Pure Reason is natural law so I can't be wrong. Anyway: I'm innocent. Zarah2nd: 'Understanding' is the ability to use some logic consistently, while using memory. And intelligenceand creativity are pointing at the ability to MAKE logics fitting with memory. |
| Employees of companies leading in 'understanding' (using 'rational' logic)
only consider the 'rational logic' side of a common sense problem. They consider complex rational models for the tiny rational part of a problem as innovative solutions for THE total common sense problem.
They develop cancer cures, test next-generation robotics, test tsunami warning systems, and test the near future of 'defense' tools. But (inherently EXTREMELY arrogant) don't ask themselves if their 'rational logic' view of cancer might block much 'wider' common sense approaches, that their robots might be awfully expensive lawn mowers, and why common sense Thai sea gypsies fled into the mountains many hours before the Asian tsunami. And why 200 years old western formal medical science based on 'rational logic' should be 'better' than 5.000 years old Ayurveda based on 'common sense logic'(example). 'Rational' solutions for America mean that uniformed to 'rational logic' addicted apes from US slaughter common sense apes in Iraq, Afghanistan. 'Rational' solutions for Russia mean that uniformed to 'rational logic' addicted apes from Russia slaughter common sense apes in Georgia. 'Rational' solutions for China mean that uniformed addicted to 'communist logic' apes with cap from China slaughter common sense apes in Tibet. |
| The Chinese character 'ci' for 'understanding' only points at the common sense intuition 'clear' = 'fitting the used logic perfectly'. Intuition = Body Emotion |
Trying to move mountains with only 'logic' only results in a red face.
There are limitless ways to come to cultural intuition. Trying all is not possible. That's why structured random search is 'clever'.
The oldest known Chinese philosophical procedure "I Ching" is close to random search. Based on the idea: EVERYTHING contains truth,
only some things more 'useful truth' than others.
It is based on dynamic balance of opposites, seeing the sequence of events as a process of structured chance, and acceptance of the inevitability of change.
The miraculously clever game "I Ching" is based on a very humble realization. That is that 999.999.999 humans out of a billion are born as more or less 'failing' try outs in the
trial and error random generator 'evolution'. And also brilliantly using the characteristics of the
selection virus 'evolution'.