Good and Evil Duality Understanding Spirits The Endarkenment Future and Past Better and Worse Sense or Nonsense Conflict or Peace



Hell/Heaven creation: Dualism of Catholic Paradigm / Angels of TRUTH (rational 'minds') wipe out Poor Devils
'Justice' ('Objectivity') is a Western Creation leading to Prisons, Death Penalties (Law and Order), Power Thinking and War on Terrorism

A rational 'mind'. A judge punishes non-conformity with his IDEALS. Roman Christian 'ideas' JUDGE sense reality as conflict of (absolute) 'good' versus (absolute) 'evil', common sense only BALANCEs (temporary') better' and (temporary) 'worse'. Sense reality might locally be REASONed by you into 'innocent' and 'guilty'. For Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) 'good' implied 'reason'. Already Leonardi DaVinci 1452 – 1519) said: Nothing can be loved or hated unless it is first known. (=JUDGED).
If 'reason' ('understanding') through the IDEAS 'anger/hate' judges that 'angry' behavior is proper, then 'understanding' makes you behave 'hateful/angry' even after reality changed. 'Reason' ('understanding' or 'rationality') is local temporary intuition made into 'judgement (using absolute logic).

Mind over Body: Angels of TRUTH 'Anger' does not need reality (fundamentalists only need 'anger' to 'judge' and fight Wars on Terrorism), 'understanding' only needs hypotheses (dreams caused by immaterial 'morals or 'metaphysics) .
poor hunted fellow humans



Then local sensing of reality might make a leap in a paradigm shift, and The dangerous Terrorists after this Leap might suddenly be poor hunted fellow humans.


'Ideas' are personal 'intuition' mixed with cultural ritual in logical shape

'Bad' is undistinguishable from 'good', and common sense therefore only looks at the local balance between 'better' and 'worse'.








Duality

'Goodness was defined by the 'good' people themselves (the truthful, the pharisees, the aristocrats, the masters, the rich, the owners, the politicians), that is, the those who 'judge' themselves as noble, higher-ranking, and higher-thinking people and who defined as evil everything they judged as 'not good', low-minded, common, and vulgar. Denying history: Prejudice 'good=power consistent' of the 'powerful' defines evil=bad=not-good of those without power.

... And around their 'judgement' of 'good' such selfdefined 'good' always created a 'science' (religion). 'Truth' can also be what you 'judge' as simple, bitter, hateful, repellent, uncatholic, immoral ....


what is good and what is evil In Superiority Rituals dividing a virtual reality in tiny steps from the idea Angels in Heaven (Absolute Good) to the idea Devils in Hell (Absolute Bad) like in the Western World in 'Catholicism' and Rationalism results in weird behavior (without realizing). Cultural members locally 'weave' myths around what is culturally 'good' (some extreme of better) and what is culturally 'bad' (some extreme of worse). Not seldom fighting 'evil'/'abnormal with law-and-order/rules. And that typically results in things from slavery to ...'war on terrorism'. Examples Canada and Australia, both goverments recently apologized. In earlier times this resulted in MUCH worse things like Apartheid, Klu Klux Klan, Red Khmer.


Cultural Relativism without judging researches 'bad' and 'good', as extreme sides of local paradigms. Because what is defined as terrorism in protestant culture (culture-1), is guerilla for freedom in Iran (culture-2). Christians like to consider non-christian behavior as 'terrorism'. "In our tradition, Christianity, we are taught to love those who revile us." Loving them to death by hunting them as 'terrorist'?.


The Israel-Palestine Conflict shows that a fence dividing different views on life is reasoned into ferocious 'intifada'. It has no use to seek for one or twosided control or compromise. Needed is MUTUAL change, that reduces pressure of the ethical balloon 'heaven' .







Understanding

understander Since the 'dreaming' ancient Greek biologer Aristotle most ex Roman Empire people (The Whites = Western World people) started believing in the IDEA 'human' and consider beings that don't 'think' (hallucinate) as 'animals'. Especially most fundamental Christians started worshipping 'understanding' (spirituality), and by far most extreme Protestants. Leading to egoist behavior.
'Whites' in agricultural way believe that their immaterial 'spirit' makes them 'good farmers of sinful 'human animals'. 'Evil' according to these people is : doing something that is considered 'sinful' on own farm.

Mexicans (Puertoricans, Cubans, Phillippinos,...) must be 'sinful' to fundamental US Christians , because most of them keep Mexican servants as human-animals (pets = slaves). Mexicans in the ghetto Mexico (concentration country) and training to be 'good' enough for being 'pet' of US-human produce mood 'good'.

Of course a lot of behavior is more useful to local culture than raping a child, but remember that 'rapere' was invented as forbidden by the ancient Romans to be able to punish THEFT of sex slaves. Female elephants defend their daughters against bulls, but also don't eat less if things go wrong.
'Psychological damage' is CULTURAL hallucination. Like all hallucinations treacherously real. This virtual reality leads to the non-productive reaction to cultural 'shame'. Similar to imagining a COOL swimming pool (good) in a HOT desert (evil) , and out of 'thirst' with a red face diving in the sand (to avoid 'evil').
If the emotion 'feeling thirsty' makes you eat sand, then your brain (sensory motor) plays tricks.














The Endarkenment

enlightenment endarkenment Since the 'endarkenment' by Western Enlightenment with the rationalism of Rene Descartes and since especially Immanuel Kant Roman Christian culture excelled in placing absolute fences: 'kingdom of heaven'/'jungle of sinful flesh', good/bad, white/black, rich/poor, political/religious, body/mind, objective/subjective, pretty/ugly, 1st world/ 3rd world, soldier/terrorist, war-on-terrorism/fighting-for-freedom, normal/abnormal and so on. 1 example: 'objective' is an absolute superiority notion, EVERYTHING is subjective.

In 'rationalism the dream 'objective' is linked to another dream 'justice'. Leading to dualities like: (justice=good, hell=evil)
The whole Western World was built around the local dream 'justice'.
In fact 'justice' (Western World way) in practice was used to continue corruption, slavery, genocide and to suppress freedom-fighting. And to claim all natural resources for a relatively small group of multi-multi billionaires.
Leading ouside Western World to: 2nd and 3rd world, poverty, misery and more severe freedom fighting.

Deciding that 1 party is 'objective' inherently makes an opposing party 'subjective'.
The disguised prejudice 'objectivity' decides that WE are 'right' and THEY are 'wrong.
It is applying WORLDWIDE the rules of a tiny WESTERN dream.
That is like presuming life on our world is not multidimensional but less than flat, only a straight line between 'good' and 'evil'
Herbert Marcuse already clearvoyantly described western man as: one dimensional man.

Time for CHANGE. In two world wars the The Angels of Death(The 'Allied Forces') claimed themselves as 'objective'/'normal' and made the 'subjective'/'anormal' 'Evil Devils' die like rats.

'Communication' exceeds 'One Dimensional TRUTH + War on Terrorism'. The one dimensional 'Kingdom of Heaven' is getting cracks. Western World 'politicians' (pharisees) see The people in Iran as agressive 'rats' with atom bombs. To EXPERIENCE the heartwarming hospitality in Iran only takes 'curiosity'.

Relative thinking is observing 'rats' looking from a different angle or using different light, and suddenly seeing 'humans'. Or vice versa.
The classic Popper Kuhn 'Debate' opposed 'rat-heaven' with common sense (Popper's absolute Critical Rationalism and Kuhn's relative paradigm thinking).








Past and Future
Future Definition / Definition of Future / Meaning of Future

Future until the 21st century was often related to 'time'.
Then it was defined as: That what is to be or to come or; existing in later 'time'.
Since time only is an illusion (a help to grasp history and aging), also THE 'future' is an illusion ( seen as 'continuous step in time away departing from THE present').
All that can be said about future is that is: not now.

'Future' is related to willpower and ideals, to goals that might be realized.
Jumping from 'sense world I' to 'sense world II' is discrete. Tomorrow is an OTHER day. When looking at differences mainly an extension from today, BUT when looking at ethics change might be HUGE.
Within most cultures 'future' became seen as some linear extension of available knowledge. Inherently quite pessimistic, not showing any creativity.

History might be considered as a sequence of paradigms seperated by jumps. Then between 'now' and 'the future' is a paradigm shift
A shift on personal level, but bunched also a shift on the accumulate level culture.
Commonly Kuhnian Paradigm Shifts as maintenance of the dominant paradigm. VERY rarely a seemingly HUGE jump towards a new Reality Design.

The last ATTEMPT to redirect future paradigms was that of the Judean Zoroastrian (Gentile = Christian) Jesus, later corrupted in The Roman Empire and in Mohammedan Worlds. Religious Roads towards a Future are one-way alleys with a dead end. Opening up such roads by trying to change the direction is like trying to bend lightnings. This TREMENDOUS 'project' of Jesus was dismantled in joint effort by Romans and Pharisees (See Western World History)

As a frightening exposure of the power of Romans and Pharisees in their War on Terrorism Jesus was crucified as terrorist, like later his brother was stoned to death as terrorist and many of his disciples were brutally murdered as 'mujahideen' (strugglers in opposition) .
The 21st Century Paradigm will finish his efforts to reintroduce happiness with love/respect.

Evolution is 'now', and this endless process results in some 'future'. Of course this changing of 'the now' in some 'future' is experienced as semi-continuity, but the abstract notion 'continuity' hides that 'now' becomes the next 'now' through DECISIONS.










Better and Worse
Quality Definition / Definition of Quality / Meaning of Quality

It might be a disappoinment but 'quality' is just local effectivity (common sense). Evolution stores in DNA and in common sense what is effective and forgets what fails. It is obviously not effective to kill fellow beings or destroy environment.

What is effective on the VERY VERY long term is stored in DNA, and what works 'temporarily' (that might be several ages) is stored in common sense. Because all humans share most of DNA and common sense what is effective became to be called 'quality'.


And then effectivity is not seen in virtual ways like 'economical sense' or 'management sense'.
'Effectivity' in evolution is what works for billions of years.


local effectivity: 'science' A local so called 'Natural Law' like 'democracy of the people' is not only the opposite of evolution, it is dangerous. Because 'jealousy' in that case gets a formal procedure that helps 'the people' to destroy quality. Then to beat 'quality' the slogan becomes 'rules are rules' or like in WWII 'befehl ist befehl'. A tendency that is obvious in the US and Europe.





IF Social Anthropology (Ethnologischer Forschung) is based on an absolute concept of 'good-evil' (like in all Roman Christian cultures; disguised as 'understanding') THEN such research is not value free. 'Understanding' is as old as Enlightenment (a few ages), and only accepted in 'The Western World'.
On earth the evolutional values were archived in DNA and common sense. Also not value free, but product of BILLIONS of years survival testing.








The Wishful Thinking of Metaphysics

Metaphysics is trying out in some local culture of some abstract ethics. Because that ethics might be completely abstract (no connection to common sense), it is better to speak about fantasy or dream.
The ancient Hellenistic Greek Aristotle designed a dual fantasy world for his master the maniac Alexander the Terrible. That way Alexander could talk about his plunder missions as successful operations.
In Persia this Alexander robbed 2500 tons of gold and silver and killed many thousands of people.
(It is crucial to return from dream to again reality, otherwise the result is a forever 'bad trip' in some virtual reality.

Often though such dreams (visions) are made airborn by some highpriest of traditional knowledge. Wernher von Braun considered his V2 missiles designed for Hitler to explode in London as a huge step for mankind, but used this quote when sending a much more expensive V2 to the moon as Head of NASA.
Such hero's of Tradition are used to give their own fantasies names like 'theory', 'invention', 'innovation''or 'concept.
Anyway that doesn't change the fact that outside their own fantasy such dreams are nothing more than creating a virtual reality as way to make sense of reality.

wishful thinking or metaphysics Good and Evil changes in Google and Evil; thanks to Scroogle google screwed; thanks to scroogle Such dreams are aimed at explaining reality. That's why I speak about 'wishful thinking'. If you want to be elected, then out of lack of leadership qualities you might erase critics in a war on terrorism. The goal is similar, to define as 'good' your own views about reality (prejudices).

Sea gypsies in Thailand survived the 2005 tsunami, by correct interpretation of signs given by the ocean. That is doing the same as very sophisticated and expensive warning systems, only using their common sense. Now Thai goverment housed them in a reservate under the condition that they shall not practice fishing anymore. Destroying a practically free warning system as designed by the billions of years old firm Evolution Inc., and replacing it with millions of dollars so called intelligent metal boxes as patented by some computer system clone of one hundred years old dustgrain IBM.













Split or Together ; Conflict or Peace

To presume conflict in a family between 'The Superiors' and 'The Inferiors' is PLAYING 'snake in the paradise'. Example: Chinese Communists and Tibetan followers of Dalai Lama.
Common Sense is living together with plusses and minuses, and finding some balance.
Answering violence, with more violence, is dualist thinking. Presuming 'evil' violence (terrorism) and 'good' violence (law and order).
Instead of realizing that violence = violence and violence leads to violence (Bobby Kennedy)

Two partially mixed cultures might show one or two way genocide. Of course genocide is 'unstable' ritual behavior, and often is horrible.
But creating a conflict, and 'solving' that conflict by engineering two side by side cultures is no lasting 'solution'. Example Common Sense: I'm sure The Dalai Lama supports the working towards a free Tibetan culture WITHIN overall China.
Example 'rationality: 'Solving' a Kosovo - Serbia 'conflict' by accepting conflict and creating TWO independent cultures.

Both in Kosovo and Serbia live beautiful people, Albanians and Serbs. The two cultures trigger partly fundamental behavior, it's that behavior that should be altered.
Change in IDEAS is simple, like giving a few dollars to charity.
CHANGE in BEHAVIOR is only accomplished by experimenting out of WILL to Live Together in Peace.



Paradigm Shift Zarah II
Return to Common Sense
Zarah II,