paradigm defense rational donkey paradigm view
Israel Palestine Conflict; Restart of the Crusades
In 451AC at the Council of Chalcedon with a Byzantine Argument Monophysite Christanity (so also later Islam) was thrown out of Europe
In present day Egypt, a 'Byzantine argument' means onesided use of logic in which only one party can prove its point of view
Most of the 13 million or so Jews in the world are Ashkenazim. That is they originated in the Rhine-area in central Europe. Half of the Ashkenazim descended from just four women between 1000 and 2000 ages ago.
'quote' Confucius: The nobler sort of man stresses the qualities in others. The inferior stresses weaknesses;

A map of the Middle East shows Israel as tiny US-splinter in a HUGE part of the world outside the Rational Paradigm. A splinter with a by the US financed powerful army and with nuclear force, but without petroleum/gas.

History: Many religious and historical texts present Israel as simular to Judah. A serious misleading mistake (?). It looks like replaying history. Ancient Judah (especially Jerusalem) was under protection of Persia. Judah including Jerusalem was annexed by Israel (capital Samaria). Israel has a history of agression towards Judah/Palestine (think of King Herod), and has an historical fear of Persia/Iran. Persia was trampled by Islam (635AC) and also Jerusalem was taken (635AC).

israel palestine conflict, paradigm war During the Crusades The Church of Rome in vain tried to reconquer Jerusalem. On the contrary, Jerusalem ended in Muslim territory. The pro Herod Hellenistic Jews went to Europe. Many ages of peace.
Both Islam (variant of Syrian Catholicism) and later Protestantism (German variant of Roman Catholicism) are by Roman Catholicism seen as seriously heretical.
After WWII the Catholic Church restarted the Crusades, helped by Zionism and by the money and power of the Rothschilds. Israel was created, a roman christian outpost in the oil-rich Middle East world.
The first Israelian president Chaim Weizmann quite revealingly made the genocidal remark: [palestines are] the rocks of Judea, obstacles that have to be cleared. Since then the hardcore among the Jews are busy creating a new paradigm border for the Rational Paradigm. In 'rational' terms this dirty war is called 'eliminating a threat'. If this border conflict 'proves' one thing, then it is that unlimited 'freedom of speech' is disastrous.


A genuine improvement of Middle East-Western World relations needs to address the genocide of Palestine by 53thrd US-state Israel. A real change triggering respectful debate and not a polite but unconfronting tea-talk.














.

Some more history

Some more history, starting with Alexander the Great (356BC-323BC), because this Alexander the Cursed completely and abruptly rearranged the power structure in the Middle East. Alexander believed that he was a halfgod. He had inherited and very powerful professional and totally obedient army (Alexander had everybody killed who was critical about his egocentrism). Greco-Macedonian Alexander the Great totally surprised the 'sleepy' Middle East worldpowers (Persia, Egypt, Assyria, Hindu India) and in a few years conquered all of the Middle East (Hellenistic Age). Some ages later the Romans used his effort to create the eastern part of their Roman Empire. The Romans admired Alexander the Great, and copied the law and order doctrine (dualism) of Alexanders tutor Aristotle
Aristotle was interpreted differently though in Alexandria and in Rome. In 445, Roman Pope Leo (Dualist following st. Peter) disputed with Pope Dioscorus Pope of Alexandria (Monophysite following Mark the Evangelist), insisting that the church as a whole should follow the view of Rome. Mark the Evangelist was the only one of the followers of Jesus who saw Jesus as a human. The church of Rome saw god as a kind of invisible absolute emperor apart from humanity. The church of Alexandria saw god as absolute morality inside humans. In 451 ac at the Council of Chalcedon directly after death of emperor Theodosius, as the last emperor to rule over the undivided empire, the view of Rome was made into law for both later Western Empire and Eastern Empire. Emperor Theodophius was qua view on the Alexandrian side, so his death was a necessity. After Chalcedon the Roman Empire did split into an eastern and western empire. The eastern half became the Byzantine Empire, with its capital at Constantinople (modern Istanbul). The western half remained centered in Rome. The Western Roman Empire collapsed in 476 as the Germanic Roman general Odoacer deposed the titular Western Emperor Romulus Augustulus In fact the rapid development of Islam during the Dark Ages indirectly is a result of Chalcedon.
But Rome didn't completely disappear as power player, Rome adapted to Catholicism. Not an empire anymore with an emperor, but a united catholic states under a pope, with a whole continent full of 'sheep'. Very catholic the 'mind' of the pope rules all the 'sheep', his body can be that of a seventy years old travestite.
Europe and Middle East are in religion not that different, both being an Abrahamic/Aristotelian . Both agressively expansive and pro slavery. The schism seems to be a political move, a power struggle. The Eastern Roman or Byzantine Empire ended in 1453 with the death of Constantine XI and the capture of Constantinople by the Ottoman Muslims. Resulting in a Hellenistic Western World were 'god' was used as logic of the powerful, and an also Hellenistic Middle East were 'god'/'allah' was seen as example for the human world.

Dealing with death of western society, and taking a road towards change means end of the Aristotelian Paradigm in Catholic shape (dualism, mind body split), and returning from emotionless 'ratio' to intuition.

ControlEmotionEmotion vs ControlControl gone Mad
RESPECT all life RESPECT all life israel palestine conflict, paradigm warisrael palestine conflict, paradigm warisrael palestine conflict, paradigm warisrael palestine conflict, paradigm war
A scenario with a lot of that suspense that proceeds towards disaster...... But then ....






Ritual Fight

But in one gang member ants learned to defend themselves by training in a tough disciplined way, and by mercilessly counter attacking any aggression of potentially dangerous other gangs. That results in things like bombing fireworks on a wedding party, and calling such an outrageous crime 'collateral damage'.
In the other gang members get very excited under constant agressive control. In their eyes the first camp became known mythically for bullying young and old, and for having rich and agressive friends.
Already 2000 years earlier first gang under a king Herod had with a genocide annihilated a gang around Jeruzalem.
The camp of the disciplined price-fighters was reimported in this neighbourhood after WWII and many hundreds of years absense, by the godfathers of a third gang that itself is quite agressive. This to defend a small the stroke of land from the HUGE area that this friend had stolen after the end of WWI from the Muslim Ottoman Empire (amongst others Libanon, Syria and Iraq).
It was not the only terrible mistake out of almost natural arrogance during that period of time made by this then powerful 'friend'.


Not really surprising, because its rational thinking (abstract) was exactly what also delivered the basis for Nazism (no offense). And this same 'friend' had refused several times urging requests of German resistance to stop Hitler. The fact that Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Ford and many important players on Wall Street decided to support Hitler financially made Nazism develop in Germany. 'Nazism' might also have developed in England (this time lead by Churchill). Fascism is since ancient Aristotle and Alexander the 'Great' embedded in all of Western culture (Roman Christian). And in early 21st century it doesn't need brilliant Hitlers anymore. Mediocre murderously egoistic presidents is enough
This mistaken friend was one of the competing 'predators' that caused WWI and in that way indirectly WWII. And after those two Tsunami like wars this friend played the friendly innocent uncle. Only always was involved when major Muslim properties could be looted.
Natural Islam is a tolerant belief, although the totally dominant religion Muhammedan Islam is quite agressive. Generally Islam is no threat at all.
Similar Jesus worship was tolerant, but the religion Roman Catholicism has a history of unprecedented violence.

Like usual in gangs of ants both proceed like perfectly organized machines. You just needed to put them in a conflict situation and they perform like expected. Only this sandy neighbourhood called 'West bank' happens to be part of the scenario of a series of battles 1.5 thousand years ago in which the camp of 'the powerful friend' in a series of for the Muslim World DEVASTATING wars knowns as "Crusades" choose to take the side of a tiny rebellious hebrew gang. That gang happens to be one of the now fighting ant cultures, and was compelled to build a future in these sandy surroundings. This hot dry dusty playground was renamed to "state of Israel".

by Benjamin Tan, Singapore







World Wars

World War I ended in a game of power politics with soldiers as 'small change'. Many totally ridiculous borders were drawn. In WWII the Allied Forces saved Western Europe, and should be honored for that. But remember that it was IBM that with computer administration ACTIVELY made the holocaust possible.
I honestly don't grasp how IBM can have offices in Israel and Palestine, and that Israel trusts US and UK. Rural Palestine was many ages ago start of Christian History, but neither Muhammedan Islam nor Hebrew religion are close to the beliefs of Jesus. The prophet Jesus sentenced to death by crucifixion by Jerusalem Pharisees.
And, after the Nazi Reich was already completely defeated, millions of innocent Germans were in fascist way killed like ants. This happened in a horror movie where flying Germans were butchered like in a slaughterhouse in an inferno of bombs and mitrailleur fire.

Saving Continental Europe was done by allied boys used as gun food, that's the true part of the created myth. But the missing part is that it ended in quite ordinary power politics. German territory (including Austrian Hungarian Empire) was divided in something like 10 parts. Some completely offered to Stalin's Russia, and the rest given away as communist buffers (Eastern Germany, Poland, Tsjechoslovakia, Hungaria etc.).
Like vultures the allied forces fought about German and Muslim bones. Allied leaders were end of war more eager to murder millions of innocent Germans in 'dangerous' Germany, than to confront Stalin. Britain often decided to cooperate with the Russia of Stalin, instead of fighting. Only Austria (read Vienna + surroundings) remained in Western Europe, peculiar because Vienna had been a source of nazism, and was captured by the Russian Army. 'Vienna' must have had powerful friends (the Rothschild family?)
Without going too deep into it: many educated Jews in history protested against the nation states, and thus also were anti zionist. In WWII most anti zionist Jews were murdered, so after WWII Zionism was a dominant movement, of in majority Jewish have-nots + demagogues , whose only tie with Palestine was greed. An interesting eye-opener for understanding Israel politics, fanatic defense of 'lawfully inherited' stolen goods + lawfully stealing more 'property. No mistake, have-nots deserve better, but not at the cost of other have-nots using the immense power and wealth of the Rothschild dynasty.

As a kind of unasked for Marshall help to Stalin's Russia nearly all Germans living in Poland with a rain of bullets were extinguished, though most were glad that Hitler was finally killed.


As impartial observer I must remark that the protestant US only feels solidarity with Israel, because genocide of Red Indians is similar to genocide of Palestines. And because the family Rothschild has more power than a US president. Both Israel and US practice the same fascist doctrine of Law and Order.

World War 0 was a murderous world war, and fought in a tiny area in 8 episodes. That's because armies moved at walking speed in those times and gathering a new army was a HUGE venture. These mythical collisions between gray Catholic strength and colorful Muslim flexibility were called "the Crusades", and ended undecisive.
But it started the myth of the dirty traitors and the honorable defenders of traditional values. Who is who is not clear. And afterwards the assisted colony Israel gradually accepted many habits of its Catholic friends. Combining dirty traitors with honorable warriors asks for serious trouble.
Many local conflicts resulted from WW0, WWI and WWI. To find a overview of all resulting wars look at: democide. Nice overview. Only the sponsor USA of this 'unpartial' research is miraculously also missing as top murderer.






Duo Education


What is necessary is training all ants to respect the natural wish for free expression in the second colony. And in this second colony should be done the reverse: teaching all members to respect the through holocaust acquired control handicap in the first colony. If this suffices then the two colonies can both live together without problems. Because the emotional colony had no part in the holocaust of the other colony, but doesn't want to suffer a similar genocide.


This is most probably not enough, than BOTH Colonies should make minor adaptions in order to close the gap in behavior. That would result in 1 colony, in which ants not even realize that there were originally two. Instead of both sides living in a dirty war.

'Muslims are good', 'Jews are good' or 'Muslims are bad', 'Jews are bad' are ABSTRACT statements and like any abstract idea contain not even a grain of truth. In fact Jews originally were very close to Palestines (before erasing them in 'dirty war' in the times of King Herod, see world history).

Now use this knowledge to tackle what got known as: Conflicts between Israel and Palestine, Middle East Conflict; Palestine Israel Conflict; conflict israel palestina; Conflict between Israel and Palestine; Israel Palestinian Conflict; Israel War; Israel conflict; Palestine conflict; Palestine Intifada; Palestine at War; Israel-Palestinian conflict; Israel-Palestine war; Israel Palestine Intifada; conflict West - Islam; conflict Christianity - Islam; Arab Israeli Conflict; Israeli Arab Conflict; Palestinian Tragedy; israeli palestinian conflict; Arab-Jewish Conflict; Israel-Arab conflict; The Jewish-Arab Conflict; Zionist-Arab Conflict; Israel vs. Palestine; konflik palestina


In 1 thing Hindus make sense: the dualism (body mind split) in the Abrahamic religions like catholicism and Islam is disastrous.










Chickens and Foxes

israel palestine apartheid: foxes and chickens on an island I completely grasp the suspision and frustration in: Arafat and Annexations. Based on my cultural roots by intuition I even sympathize with the content. But nevertheless it's fighting Israelian hardliners with the mind version of the obviously not working weapon used by them for control. i.e. rational behavior. That is trying to fight apartheid with the thinking that caused this nightmare dream.
Chickens and foxes start 'getting an intuition ' of each other AFTER living together. To think that a rational compromise is necessary BEFORE living together is rational reasoning. UNconditional love and respect should do the job. End quarreling by making a joint DECISION to enter a 21st Century Paradigm that overrides both Bible and Koran.

And what is worse, the authors clearly fail to imagine the haunting effects on a people of a holocaust. They certainly should not be blamed though, probably they were born after WWII and in an allied country. Then without realizing they are in this matter handicapped in two ways. This strongly influences their view, and it shapes their actions.
It's no use to realize that there is a very dirty war between 'settlers' and 'hunted humans'. The essential problem goes deeper. Unconsciously this one-sided view resulting in one-sided actions causes one half of the problem.
Considering part of humanity as animals is a Catholic and Hebrew basic problem and it's totally confusing to hide this essential side of the debate. The Western World not being willing to admit that the behavior of Israel in some ways equals that of Nazi Germany is blocking solutions. Remember that Israel was the Western Country that defended the South African Apartheid regime until the end. Hunting humans (genocide) since long is forbidden.

When assisting a layer of foxes to settle in an area belonging to chicken (no offense), THEN you ask for serious trouble. Foxes are excellent hunters, and chicken quite creative in defense. That ends in all the chickens being murdered, or the foxes having been picked to death by angry chicken.

AND take care that such an essential mistake is never made again

In Europe say 40 years ago Protestants and Roman Catholics were still in state of war (like in Northern Ireland only without killing). At present in most countries in Europe interreligious marriages are nothing special (Baptist US is ethically MUCH less 'developed' than Europe 50 years ago) .
There's no way back, the religious followers of the Roman view of Jesus and the Muhammadan view of Islam must learn to share life. The best way to prevent quarreling is to create many Jemoh's and Mohje's.







Compromising Stinks

paper for compromises It shows the horrible force resulting from a cultural conflict. Compared to it a plague of typhus is a friendly game. It takes a world wide culture SHOCK in both involved major cultures to awaken each of them out of their different nightmares (i.e. paradigm shift).
Such a culture shock should not like in many paper-thick 'peace compromises' be restricted to Israel and Palestine.
Libya, Iraq and Iran were never threats to the United States. The only threat Iraq, Libya or Iran posed was a threat to Israel's dominance of nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Israel already in before Jesus was born was a bitter enemy of Persia (present day Iran)
It ought not to be a compromise around settled powers, but should be taking risk by making choices that shake BOTH the international Christian and Muslim Worlds.

But really new solutions always take getting used to anyway. Building a iron wall around Palestine, is reviving the ancient conflict between 'babylonian' Israel and Jewish Judah, and starting another cold war. This time an American Arab Conflict. The last cold war was an America-Russia conflict and took 40 years. It ended by Russia getting capitalist, and cherishing the Western ideals around individualism 'liberty' and 'democracy'. More is needed to close the discussion. Temporarily absolute laws of nature can be changed, there are wise aspects in Bible, Quran and in the Noble Truths. The following balance of individualism and collectivism might attract Western people, Muslims and Buddhists. See: individualism and collectivism. Leaving this essential cultural conflict behind takes a readiness for creation of new ethics, give a steady base to the majority of people (Christians, Muslims and Buddhists) who respect each other and need new ethical rules. Why not take the leap into the 21st century paradigm.

samaria was israel and bitter enemy of juda The orthodox jews of Israel (capital Samaria) already in ancient times despised the common sense jews of Judah (capital Jerusalem). See Livius.org.
Jesus was educated by his mother Mary as an extremely original common sense 'prophet' with POLITICAL message: Respect for all Beings, Stop Slavery! His refreshing ideas about human equality shocked formal scientists (pharisees), who were used to respectful treatment as masterminds. It frightened traditional social leaders used to practice power thinking.



















A point behind Thinking in terms of Influence


terms of influence History knew many 'holocausts' (dirty wars). Destroying the strength of an essentially different culture. Some examples:

Iskander the Cursed burning down Zoroastrian Persia. (Alexander the 'Great')
The United States Red Indian Wars (genocide on Industrial scale).
Atomic Boms on Japan (unimaginable)
The North Korean War (the technologically advanced West against 1 'underdeveloped' asian country)
Vietnam War (US indirectly fighting China and Russia, using tools of level Agent Orange)
Northern Ireland Conflict (UK fighting Ireland)
Afghanistan War (US fighting Taliban that were sponsored by the same US to fight Russia)
Saddam Hussein against Iran (sponsored by US, nerve gas knowledge from Germany and fighterplanes including pilots from France)


And now the Israel-Palestine Conflict also reached the level of like the US versus the Red Indians, considering the Palestinians as animals
Do you start to realize why the arrogant power politics of the US is hated outside the Western World?
And why the British Empire was hated?

Better forget this period in history characterized by 'rational thinking' in terms of power, and make a fresh start in a 21st Century Paradigm
















Visionary Leadership


It needs explicit making of basic rules, and alterations on Christian side as well as on Muslim side. Sincerely trying to grasp people born in another culture might look just another tough job, but is EXTREMELY difficult. Compare it to convincing US Goverment to close down FBI and CIA. It takes vice versa knowing of history and cultural myths.

This is a quality lacking in 'compromise politicians'. Instead of nameless Nobel Prize winners it takes real leaders, with guts and acceptance level like Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Ghandi (just examples).












Road to Peace

Peace is (like most things) not rational and there is no twoway-road leading to peace. Peace is a relative notion with many faces, but nevertheless not fit for bargaining. You can't like in quantum physics partially take one road, and partially another. It is a relative notion, necessary to join two absolute cultures. The road to peace takes more than the until now applied Control Theory (compromising) and needs steering (taking risks and making choices).

That won't be fun for Western Christianity, but might be difficult as well for Islam. On both sides of the Road to Peace live extremely rich countries next to extremely poor countries. The new 'Highway to Peace' definite definitely will change the present balance of power. This by cutting through present cultural borders, and inherently changing cultural defense (the cultural 'traffic signs').
That's why it's LOGICAL when aiming for longlasting world peace also to involve Buddhism
Buddhism and Islam SEEM to coexist quite well, about mixing Western and Buddhist thought see here.

Don't make it a big undecisive meeting with piles of politicians. Why not send ALL politicians over 25 to a far away holiday island, where they are free to bombard each other with compromises? And chat about the good old times, playing their favorite game "Twisting Truth". With as food only MacDonald hamburgers and Coca Cola. That will do the job in a year or so.
Just send 3 young 'warriors' accompanied by 3 wize 'wizards' to the primary peace talks. Give them perfect communication means with the outer world, and the order not to return without new traffic rules (ethics).
I expect that once the different cultures have formulated their trio of basic rules, that finding a solution will be straightforward. A straight road but connecting all major cultures. A kind of Trans Siberia Express, but now in different cultures. A flying vehicle would be a nice symbol for transport of Peace.












Making a Myth


The most difficult and time consuming part of this process might be finding the 3 candidates and the 3 wizards. Sure suitable people are available, but the world of opinions of such people (and inherently their 'power') has been neglected for a considerable time. 'Wizards' are as powerful as their culture allows them to be. Don't restrict searching to the neighborhood of the presently usual places of power.

This peace should become a world wide symbol like 'the first man on the moon'.
This meeting should get a place in history as THE PEACE MEETING, a symbolic ceremony that gives rise to the creation of an intercultural myth. That's why large media coverage is a must. The accent should be on the act of creating world wide peace, and not on the small to be solved differences.
Overall peace should become like a huge victory similar to 'reaching the moon', and the 3 duo's as humble but perfect actors in the play. The pairs should breath energy, respect, love and fun. The young warriors should be creative, daring ....and dominant (natural leaders, like alpha males or females. The wizards loving, experienced and respected. The warriors represent the future, the wizards the tradition. The peace bargaining should be real, an the resulting new 'commandmends' must be felt in 'the human pack' as the NEW RULES necessary for creating peace.


People in all corners of the world should be drawn to some television, and while looking create their own fantasy of their contribution in the new world culture of this 'human pack'. I propose 3 duo's of tv directors, Will.I.am and Eminem for Western Society and 2 other inspiring and talented duo's for Islam and Buddhism, Everyone should FEEL that in this culture every member of 'the human pack' will have equal respect.
For music and dance I again propose 3 duo's. Madonna and Shakira for Western Society, and 2 mixes of experience and enthusiasm for Islam and Buddhism.
NOT the peace talk in itself is important, but the happening creating a new world wide myth.

The world wide media in all 3 major cultures have become perfect communication means (like howling wolves). They almost seem made for this job. They ought to take this job seriously, and 'sing' in perfect cooperation. Dominant young hero's sure are there, just a matter of looking in the suited way. For the wizards think of a freethinker like myself for Western society (my young warrior in training seems to have given up the difficult mind fight), someone like the Dalai Lama for Buddhism and a muslim FREEthinker for Islam.
Then I'm convinced that this will result in a big jump forward.

To honor the totally misinterpreted very peaceminded Friedrich Nietzsche I propose the name "Camp Zarathustra".











Peace Party

Camp Zarathustra should be finished with a world wide broadcasted party. All cultures bring presents.

The Africans contribute Rythm of Life (Variation by Movement)
The South American Red Indians contribute Carnaval (Market of Variation)
The Polynesians contribute Hospitality and Love of Nature.
Together this takes care of flexibility in expression .

Islam, Muslim branch of Christianity, contributes Mathematics.I guess they acquired it through the ancient Chinese.
Amongst others insight in exponential growth.
I have 1 idea, I give it to you, now there are 2.
1 sex 1 sex 2 sex 4 sex 8 sex 16 sex 32 sex 64 sex 128 sex 256 .....

Christianity contributes the gem Abstract Thinking (take care: the power of Atom Bombs)
Together this takes care of local flexibility in technology.

And finally Buddhism, the main part of the social culture of the future contributes the priceless feature Relative Thinking (Variation of Standpoint)
This takes care of relative flexibility in social life....
But the most effective weapon is the babyboom (variation through sex, amplified by experience)
(I guess foxes and chickens produce friendly but fearful little dragons).
The compromise solutions suggested by US, USSR and Europe, based on guns and laws, are like 'freezing' the problem Resulting in 2 disjunct cultures, 1 underdeveloped common sense 'terrorist' Palestine and 1 developed western rational Israel. Doing virtually nothing with regard to about the basic cultural conflict. My solution:

palestine israel pais
Humans made with multi dimensional sculpting (the most successful of all shapes, smells, colors etc.) are close to Supermen











To index of The Next Paradigm Next Paradigm
page of site
next paradigm
Menu

History

Ritual Fight

World Wars

Duo Education

Chickens and Foxes

Compromising Stinks

Fresh Start

Visionary Leadership

Road to Peace

Making a Myth

Peace Party

Henk Tuten,











most pictures on the websites of Henk Tuten
Web Analytics