|
History Ritual Fight World Wars Duo Education Chickens and Foxes Compromising Stinks Fresh Start Visionary Leadership Road to Peace Making a Myth Peace Party | |||||||
Israel Palestine Conflict or War of Paradigms: WHY?
israel palestina conflicto | israele palestina conflitto | La bataille d'Israël :
Hebrews: We make war that we may live in peace (Aristotle). I admire the ritual persistence of ants. But imagine two Middle East colonies of ants with colliding behavior. Please for a few minutes consider the following 'real to life' fantasy. On a map of the Middle East Israel is like a tiny splinter in a HUGE part of the world. A splinter without petroleum and gas. History
It looks like replaying history. Ancient Judah was under protection of Persia.
Israel has a history of agression towards Judah/Palestine (think of King Herod),
and has an historical fear of Persia/Iran.
Iran wants to reinforce the former ties.
The differences are more than 2 milennia old.
The first Israelian president Chaim Weizmann quite revealingly made the genocidal remark: [palestines are] the rocks of Judea, obstacles that have to be cleared.
And then after considerable time this control behavior in one ethical world as response to emotional stone-throwing behavior in the other ethical world really raises a massive Gaza clash.
Abstract rational intelligence in Western Christianity in dirty war (genocide or in 'rational' terms: eliminating a threat) with common sense emotional intelligence in Islam.
If this conflict 'proves'one thing, then it is that unlimited 'freedom of speech' is disastrous.Naturally the temporalily chosen leaders are either extremely talented covering fascist practices as control or in tolerating violent response. Logically but stupid enough not in creating intercultural peace. A worldwide improvement of Muslim-Christian relations needs to address the elimination of The Palestine Threat through genocide by Israel. A real change triggering respectful debate and not a polite but unconfronting tea-talk.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ritual Fight But in one gang member ants learned to defend themselves by training in a tough disciplined way, and by counter attacking any aggression of potentially dangerous other gangs. Experience taught them that unknown gangs can suddenly grasp power In the other gang members get very excited under constant agressive control. In their eyes the first camp became known mythically for bullying young and old, and for having rich and agressive friends. Already 2000 years earlier first gang under a king Herod had with a genocide annihilated a gang around Jeruzalem. The camp of the disciplined price-fighters was reimported in this neighbourhood after WWI and many hundreds of years absense, by the godfathers of a third gang that itself is quite agressive. This to defend a small the stroke of land from the HUGE area that this friend had stolen after the end of WWI from the Muslim Ottoman Empire (amongst others Libanon, Syria and Iraq). It was not the only terrible mistake out of almost natural arrogance during that period of time made by this then powerful 'friend'.
Like usual in gangs of ants both proceed like perfectly organized machines. You just needed to put them in a conflict situation and they perform like expected. Only this sandy neighbourhood called 'West bank' happens to be part of the scenario of a series of battles 1.5 thousand years ago in which the camp of 'the powerful friend' in a series of for the Muslim World DEVASTATING wars knowns as "Crusades" choose to take the side of a tiny rebellious muslim gang. That gang happens to be one of the now fighting ant cultures, and was compelled to build a future in these sandy surroundings. This hot dry dusty playground was renamed to "state of Israel".
![]() World Wars
World War I ended in a game of power politics with soldiers as 'small change'. Many totally ridiculous borders were drawn. In WWII the Allied Forces saved Western Europe, and should be honored for that.
But remember that it was IBM that with computer administration ACTIVELY made the holocaust possible.
Saving Continental Europe was done by allied boys used as gun food, that's the true part of the created myth. But the missing part is that it ended in quite ordinary power politics. German territory (including Austrian Hungarian Empire) was divided in something like 10 parts. Some completely offered to Stalin's Russia, and the rest given away as communist buffers (Eastern Germany, Poland, Tsjechoslovakia, Hungaria etc.). Like vultures the allied forces fought about German and Muslim bones. Allied leaders were end of war more eager to murder millions of innocent Germans in 'dangerous' Germany, than to confront Stalin. Britain often decided to cooperate with the Russia of Stalin, instead of fighting. Only Austria remained in Western Europe. As a kind of unasked for Marshall help to Stalin's Russia nearly all Germans living in Poland with a rain of bullets were extinguished, though most were glad that Hitler was finally killed. World War 0 was a murderous world war, and fought in a tiny area in 8 episodes. That's because armies moved at walking speed in those times and gathering a new army was a HUGE venture. These mythical collisions between gray Catholic strength and colorful Muslim flexibility were called "the Crusades", and ended undecisive. But it started the myth of the dirty traitors and the honorable defenders of traditional values. Who is who is not clear. And afterwards the assisted colony Israel gradually accepted many habits of its Catholic friends. Combining dirty traitors with honorable warriors asks for serious trouble. Duo Education
What is necessary is training all ants to respect the natural wish for free expression in the second colony. And in this second colony should be done the reverse: teaching all members to respect the through holocaust acquired control handicap in the first colony.
If this suffices then the two colonies can both live together without problems.
Because the emotional colony had no part in the holocaust of the other colony,
but doesn't want to suffer a similar genocide.This is most probably not enough, than BOTH Colonies should make minor adaptions in order to close the gap in behavior. That would result in 1 colony, in which ants not even realize that there were originally two. Instead of both sides living in a dirty war. 'Muslims are good', 'Jews are good' or 'Muslims are bad', 'Jews are bad' are ABSTRACT statements and like any abstract idea contain not even a grain of truth. In fact Jews originally were very close to Palestines (before erasing them in 'dirty war' in the times of King Herod, see world history). Now use this knowledge to tackle what got known as: Conflicts between Israel and Palestine, Middle East Conflict; Palestine Israel Conflict; conflict israel palestina; Conflict between Israel and Palestine; Israel Palestinian Conflict; Israel War; Israel conflict; Palestine conflict; Palestine Intifada; Palestine at War; Israel-Palestinian conflict; Israel-Palestine war; Israel Palestine Intifada; conflict West - Islam; conflict Christianity - Islam; Arab Israeli Conflict; Israeli Arab Conflict; Palestinian Tragedy; israeli palestinian conflict; Arab-Jewish Conflict; Israel-Arab conflict; The Jewish-Arab Conflict; Zionist-Arab Conflict; Israel vs. Palestine; konflik palestina In 1 thing though Muslims unconsciously (?) are right. The body mind split in Western Christian Church is disastrous. Chickens and Foxes
I completely grasp the suspision and frustration in: Arafat and Annexations. Based on my cultural roots by intuition I even sympathize with the content. But nevertheless it's fighting Israelian hardliners with the mind version of the obviously not working weapon used by them for control. i.e. rational behavior. That is trying to fight a nightmare with the thinking that caused this horror dream.
And what is worse, the authors clearly fail to imagine the haunting effects on a people of a holocaust. They certainly should not be blamed though, probably they were born after WWII and in an allied country. Then without realizing they are in this matter handicapped in two ways. This strongly influences their view, and it shapes their actions. It's no use to realize that there is a very dirty war between 'settlers' and 'hunted humans'. The essential problem goes deeper. Unconsciously this one-sided view resulting in one-sided actions causes one half of the problem. Considering part of humanity as animals is a Catholic and Hebrew basic problem and it's to hide this side of the debate. Hunting humans (genocide) since long is forbidden.
Compromising Stinks
It shows the horrible force resulting from a cultural conflict. Compared to it a plague of typhus is a friendly game. It takes a world wide culture SHOCK in both involved major cultures to awaken
each of them out of their different nightmares (i.e. paradigm shift).Such a culture shock should not like in many paper-thick 'peace compromises' be restricted to Israel and Palestine. Libya, Iraq and Iran were never threats to the United States. The only threat Iraq, Libya or Iran posed was a threat to Israel's dominance of nuclear weapons in the Middle East. It ought not to be a compromise around settled powers, but should be taking risk by making choices that shake BOTH the international Christian and Muslim Worlds. But really new solutions always take getting used to anyway. Building a iron wall around Palestine, is only starting another cold war. This time an American Arab Conflict. The last cold war was an America-Russia conflict and took 40 years. It ended by Russia getting capitalist, and cherishing the Western ideals around individualism 'liberty' and 'democracy'. More is needed to close the discussion. Temporarily absolute laws of nature can be changed, there are wise aspects in Bible, Quran and in the Noble Truths. The following balance of individualism and collectivism might attract Western people, Muslims and Buddhists. See: individualism and collectivism. Leaving this essential cultural conflict behind takes a readiness for creation of new ethics, give a steady base to the majority of people (Christians, Muslims and Buddhists) who respect each other and need new ethical rules. Why not take the leap into the 21st century paradigm. In fact the wall around Palestine is two times as long as the border
and deliberatery changes Palestinian villages into ghetto's and steals the surrounding fields those villages need for surviving.
A point behind Power Thinking History knew many 'holocausts' (dirty wars). Some examples: Iskander the Cursed burning down Zoroastrian Persia. (Alexander the 'Great') The United States Red Indian Wars (genocide on Industial scale). Atomic Boms on Japan (unimaginable) The North Korean War (the technologically advanced West against 1 'underdeveloped' asian country) Vietnam War (US indirectly fighting China and Russia, using tools of level Agent Orange) Northern Ireland Conflict (UK fighting Ireland) Afghanistan War (US fighting Taliban that were sponsored by the same US to fight Russia) Saddam Hussein against Iran (sponsored by US, nerve gas knowledge from Germany and fighterplanes including pilots from France) And now the Israel-Palestine Conflict also reached the level of like the US versus the Red Indians, considering the Palestinians as animals Do you start to realize why outside the Western World the US is hated? Better forget this period in history characterized by power-thinking, and make a fresh start in a 21st Century Paradigm Visionary Leadership It needs explicit making of basic rules, and alterations on Christian side as well as on Muslim side. Sincerely trying to grasp people born in another culture might look just another tough job, but is EXTREMELY difficult. It takes vice versa knowing of history and cultural myths. This is a quality lacking in 'compromise politicians'. Instead of nameless Nobel Prize winners it takes real leaders, with guts and acceptance level like Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Ghandi (just examples). ![]() Road to Peace Peace is (like most things) not rational and there is no twoway-road leading to peace. Peace is a relative notion with many faces, but nevertheless not fit for bargaining. You can't like in quantum physics partially take one road, and partially another. It is a relative notion, necessary to join two absolute cultures. The road to peace takes more than the until now applied Control Theory (compromising) and needs steering (taking risks and making choices). That won't be fun for Western Christianity, but might be difficult as well for Islam. On both sides of the Road to Peace live extremely rich countries next to extremely poor countries. The new 'Highway to Peace' definite definitely will change the present balance of power. This by cutting through present cultural borders, and inherently changing cultural defense (the cultural 'traffic signs').
Don't make it a big undecisive meeting with piles of politicians. Why not send ALL politicians over 25 to a far away holiday island, where they are free to bombard each other with compromises? And chat about the good old times, playing their favorite game "Twisting Truth". With as food only MacDonald hamburgers and Coca Cola. That will do the job in a year or so. Just send 3 young 'warriors' accompanied by 3 wize 'wizards' to the primary peace talks. Give them perfect communication means with the outer world, and the order not to return without new traffic rules (ethics). I expect that once the different cultures have formulated their trio of basic rules, that finding a solution will be straightforward. A straight road but connecting all major cultures. A kind of Trans Siberia Express, but now in different cultures. A flying vehicle would be a nice symbol for transport of Peace. Making a Myth The most difficult and time consuming part of this process might be finding the 3 candidates and the 3 wizards. Sure suitable people are available, but the world of opinions of such people (and inherently their 'power') has been neglected for a considerable time. 'Wizards' are as powerful as their culture allows them to be. Don't restrict searching to the neighborhood of the presently usual places of power. This peace should become a world wide symbol like 'the first man on the moon'. This meeting should get a place in history as THE PEACE MEETING, a symbolic ceremony that gives rise to the creation of an intercultural myth. That's why large media coverage is a must. The accent should be on the act of creating world wide peace, and not on the small to be solved differences. Overall peace should become like a huge victory similar to 'reaching the moon', and the 3 duo's as humble but perfect actors in the play. The pairs should breath energy, respect, love and fun. The young warriors should be creative, daring ....and dominant (natural leaders, like alpha males or females. The wizards loving, experienced and respected. The warriors represent the future, the wizards the tradition. The peace bargaining should be real, an the resulting new 'commandmends' must be felt in 'the human pack' as the NEW RULES necessary for creating peace. People in all corners of the world should be drawn to some television, and while looking create their own fantasy of their contribution in the new world culture of this 'human pack'. I propose 3 duo's of tv directors, Michael Jackson and Eminem for Western Society and 2 other inspiring and talented duo's for Islam and Buddhism, Everyone should FEEL that in this culture every member of 'the human pack' will have equal respect. For music and dance I again propose 3 duo's. Madonna and Shakira for Western Society, and 2 mixes of experience and enthusiasm for Islam and Buddhism. NOT the peace talk in itself is important, but the happening creating a new world wide myth. The world wide media in all 3 major cultures have become perfect communication means (like howling wolves). They almost seem made for this job. They ought to take this job seriously, and 'sing' in perfect cooperation. Dominant young hero's sure are there, just a matter of looking in the suited way. For the wizards think of a freethinker like myself for Western society (my young warrior in training seems to have given up the difficult mind fight), someone like the Dalai Lama for Buddhism and a FREEthinker close to Osama Bin Laden for Islam. Then I'm convinced that this will result in a big jump forward. To honor the totally misinterpreted very peaceminded Friedrich Nietzsche I propose the name "Camp Zarathustra". Peace Party Camp Zarathustra should be finished with a world wide broadcasted party. All cultures bring presents. The Africans contribute Rythm of Life (Variation by Movement) The South American Red Indians contribute Carnaval (Market of Variation) Together this takes care of flexibility in bodyware . Islam, mother of Christianity, contributes Mathematics.I guess they acquired it through the ancient Chinese. Amongst others insight in exponential growth. I have 1 idea, I give it to you, now there are 2. 1 sex 1 sex 2 sex 4 sex 8 sex 16 sex 32 sex 64 sex 128 sex 256 ..... Christianity contributes the gem Abstract Thinking (the power of Atom Bombs) Together this takes care of local flexibility in mindware. But the most effective weapon is the babyboom (variation through sex, amplified by experience) (I guess foxes and chickens produce friendly but fearful little dragons). The compromise solutions suggested by US, USSR and Europe, based on guns and laws, are like 'freezing' the problem Resulting in 2 disjunct cultures, 1 underdeveloped common sense 'terrorist' Palestine and 1 developed western rational Israel. Doing virtually nothing with regard to about the basic cultural conflict. My solution: ![]() Constrained bodyware+mindware make the ethics of the mixed culture of the future. And finally Buddhism, the main part of the culture of the future contributes the priceless feature Relative Thinking (Variation of Thinking) This takes care of relative flexibility in mindware.... Relative thinking provides paradigm shifts to keep ethics moving Humans made with multi dimensional sculpting (the most successful of all shapes, smells, colors etc.) are close to Supermen ![]()
|