Googling is are brilliant search concept, and also such search-predators only use 'rotten food' (fundamental beliefs) out of all cultural variety (by ignoring 'alien' or 'terrorist' views of reality).
China makes a common sense move by banning one sided culturally sensitive opinions in GoogleFundamentalist English culture as in US and UK is supposed to be leading (His Master's Voice).
This view sees all languages as 'rational' schemes (following the 'pietist' Immanuel Kant who saw fundamental Roman Christian 'a priori' as 'Laws of Nature'). That is seeing ALL languages are 'rational' and presuming 1-1 relations between such languages. (cultural absolutism).
Searchengines in a nutshell (in fact some graph theory from discrete math):
1. Imagine an empty space with say 25 thousand English words (words in any character based language).
2. A duo of words either has an empty 'relation' (no websites with both words in a search) OR are connected to another word by many filled 'relations' (websites).
3. A relation is any searchword combination and might contain millions of websites, the search result in a searchengine of 1 search.
4. A subspace of words might be filled with 'thick' relations or mainly have empty relations (anything between a 'full' network and a space of floating dots).
5. Searchengines prefer 'beliefs', subsets of closely related 'relations' (sites from 1 server) that allow travelling to any point (word) in some subspace.
Since 2003 Google performs dance rituals every week, and MAJOR 'Google Dances' say 2 times per year. The major dances are VERY ANNOYING for some young high ranking websites. Rituals like 'Google Dances' aim at revaluing new subworlds of highranking sites. Although without aiming for it (?) during major Google Dances search results are quite conservative. Only settled websites and flawless (without HTML-errors) new websites without damage survive these rituals in virtual searchword-country. And for unpredictable periods competitive fresh views 'disappear'. It might take several months to return to the former web position. Possibly those major dances obstructing change is useful, but halting real change is a major disadvantage. Websites with revolutional views to get stable web positioning practically NEED to have links from highranked settled sites. Getting a site that attacks official science (from outside the scientifical world) on a good web position is ALMOST impossible.
6. Attracting searchengines is a matter of creating an 'easy travelling' subspace (creating an easy 'belief' with sites having high rankings). So of grasping how to get reasonable ranking (3 to 5) for your subdomain and high webpositions for individual websites. And of having A LOT of patience and HIGH frustration barrier.
'Fast-Thinking' or 'rationality' is even more treacherous. Fast-Food reduces food to 'calories with taste'. The doctrine rationality behind fast-thinking reduces intuition to manipulation of complex digital notions made up with only the absolute digital values 'good' (1) and 'bad' (0). 
